The new look is curvaceous, with a low, sweeping hood flowing into a sharply raked windshield and roofline. It's a much more attractive car than the one it replaces, but it's also a bit derivative, with influences ranging from the bulbous Chevrolet Caprice to the discontinued compact Geo Storm. The Storm wasn't a bad choice to mimic, for it certainly stole away many traditional Cavalier buyers looking for more design pizzazz. Unfortunately, GM stylists also appropriated one of the Storm's weakest features: oversized bumpers that come across like the automotive equivalent of Jimmy Durante's schnoz. Their massive vertical surfaces were only exaggerated by our sedan's 2-tone paint job. The rich sheen of the metallic paint was cheapened by the black plastic bumpers. The air intakes carved into the rounded front bumper are meant to give the new Cavalier an aggressive look, but with the black bumpers, the result is a goofy grin. A recommendation to the style conscious: Upgrade to a Cavalier that offers color-keyed bumpers. Bigger is better, at least that's been the credo for most automotive designers in recent years. The new car is a larger package, both inside and out. Make that a larger usable package, for although the track is 3 in. wider and the wheelbase is 2 in. longer than the previous model, the +95 Cavalier is actually 2 in. shorter overall and only 1 in. wider. The tires on the base model tend to look a little small and lost inside the large wheel wells, though Chevy offers some rather nice-looking wheels as options. Another complaint about the exterior: door handles. GM has finally adopted flush door handles, though they are not quite designed to fit the hand. If they aren't gripped carefully, they will slip away from you. Oddly, Chevy made it much easier to get out of the car, molding in finger indents on the interior door handles.
That extra room we mentioned shows up where it's really needed: in the cavalier's completely redesigned interior. The look is far more fluid than that of the previous Cavalier. Stylists like to use the word organic to describe the way it all flows together. The steering wheel is one of the car's more pleasant surprises: It looks and feels much more expensive than you'd expect. Some other interior elements, however, are carried out less successfully. In terms of user-friendliness, the passenger's mirror is hard to position. The radio placement is the biggest drawback. You have to stretch to change stations or volume. But in general, ergonomics are adequate. You'll find plenty of leg-room up front, and those seats are quite comfortable. Maybe It's a sign of our advancing age, but it seemed as if the seats in our tester could use a little more padding. And the rear seats were barely adequate: The bench was hard and unyielding and wouldn't be much fun on a long ride. On the positive side, the rear seatback folds down with ease to create a roomy, cavernous storage compartment. There's more rear legroom than in the old Cavalier, but still not nearly as much as there is in the Plymouth Neon. Incidentally, the Neon is a car lots of shoppers will choose to compare the Cavalier with. The Neon is a friendlier-looking vehicle, with a much more comforting, familiar-feeling interior. It seems to say welcome, while Cavalier has a more officious, yet efficient, feel to it. That's not to say the Cavalier doesn't come with a few pleasant surprises. There are cupholders, lots of storage pockets, standard anti-lock brakes and dual airbags. Plus a novel rear defroster that starts by melting a rectangular patch in the center of the window, and a feature that turns off the interior lights if they're left on long enough to start draining the battery. |
